2. At the outset, the questions, which have been referred by the learned single Judge in the order of Reference, read as follows:
1. Whether an Appeal would lie at all to the High Court as against the order made by the Deputy Commissioner of Endowments in O.A. in the light of the clear language of Section 88 of the Act?
2. Whether the remedy prior to the substitution of Section 88 by the present Amending Act i.e., Appeal to the District Court, would be available in the interregnum period till the Endowments Tribunal is constituted?
3. What is the scope and ambit of Section 88 of the Act and whether the term or expression "Endowments Tribunal" can be read as equivalent to the concerned Deputy Commissioner, Endowments Department, in the period of interregnum for the purpose of Section 88 of the Act?
